-
Content Count
621 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
54
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Forum & Tracker Requests
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Calendar
Everything posted by Kaidon Jorn
-
Man o man. In the teens all weekend. Have to round up my two homeless kitties and bring 'em here. That won't be fun. But absolutely necessary.
-
Whuuuuuut? So 702KOR becomes something else? Ok, well I'll deal with that when I get there.
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well....err...I'm going to wait for a bit because I still need to finish redoing all my icons. That should take about a week(?)
- 206 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
- 41 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- lightsaber models replacement
- kotor 1
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
OOOOOHHHHHH. Really? Yeah I might have the super old version I dont know...going to look. Ok, I have version 1.2.10.1 from 2007??
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
for dlg.erf Replace0=mal_door.dlg Replace1=termtort.dlg for s.rim Replace0=a_sion.ncs (destroys sion's default saber and equips mine) Replace1=a_sion_battle_cs.ncs (destroys sion's default saber and equips mine) Replace2=vash_container.utp (may take this out since I still need to make a M4-78 compatibility patch) File0=a_darthsbrs.ncs (fired from mal_door.dlg, places revan and malak sabers in footlockers ) File1=a_spwn_ass.ncs (fired from termtort.dlg) File2=n_elite_ass.utc (.utc created with a_spwn_ass.ncs)
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Aight I have to fix my 702KOR module. I noticed that TSLRCM doesn't include a 702KOR.mod so I went about inserting my edited files into the _dlg.erf and _s.rim for the tslpatcher op, but then when I got there it literally booted me back out to the main load/save screen. 😩 So I went about making a 702KOR.mod to place in the modules folder....that fixed it yes, but is that how I should really do it? What would make inserting or replacing files in the dlg,erf and s.rim basically crash to main load screen? Missing files in one of those modules? Not sure what to do at this point.
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Whut? I'm guessing a couple of those are maybe Mandalorian or somesuch? I'm sure there’s explanations behind those names, though i have no idea what they would be… I do like Perspective and maybe Venerate so far. Let me get some more from you guys
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hey again, Today I'm looking to rename Vash's silver bladed saber. But I haven't a clue as to what. So I'm taking any and all suggestions (unless they're completely hokey) from you fine people. What is this saber called? I will probably reskin it one more time to get the directional (turned) steel texture smaller so it'll look better. But there it is...
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Oh I just mean I mixed and matched what you made me. As in, I might not have used something for what you labeled them as. Like your original default red I used for Darth Revan's instead, so I switched it for another one.
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Arbitrary check in. all sabers had their aurora light multipliers jacked up to 1.6 (single), 1.4 (double-bladed), and 1.8 (specials). Short sabers I’ll probably do at 1.5 when I get around to redoing the default replacement hilts mod. Learn Schematic is now a feat called Read Schematic… Kaevee now has the Padawans Lightsaber. (No its not yellow bladed) Crystal icons have been massively consolidated and completly remade by SH, and me… aaaand thats all i can think of right now....
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
OMG OMG OMG! It compiled and it works! Woooo! I just combined c_have_item with the c_have_feat that I made earlier today and it works. int StartingConditional() { object oPC = GetFirstPC(); int nQuantity = GetScriptParameter (1); int i; string sItem = GetScriptStringParameter(); object oItem = GetItemPossessedBy (GetPartyLeader(), sItem); if(nQuantity == 0) nQuantity = 1; if ((GetHasFeat(245, oPC) == TRUE) && (GetIsObjectValid(oItem))) { return 1; } else { return 0; } } Can you see any reason this wouldn't work? Because i left out the part about returning int stack size from the original c_have_item script at the bottom there.... int StartingConditional() { int nQuantity = GetScriptParameter( 1 ); int i; string sItem = GetScriptStringParameter(); if(nQuantity == 0) nQuantity = 1; object oItem = GetItemPossessedBy (GetPartyLeader(),sItem); if (GetIsObjectValid(oItem)) { int nStackSize = GetItemStackSize(oItem); return (nQuantity <= nStackSize); } return 0; } But why is the (int i;) there? What does that do?
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well I have a fix for it for now. I made a check script just for the feat. int StartingConditional() { object oPC = GetFirstPC(); if (GetHasFeat(245, oPC) == TRUE) { return 1; } else { return 0; } } So i'm just using the two starting conditionals for the individual schematic nodes Was thinking maybe i should put c_have_feat at the beginning of the node so it wont even show up if you haven't gotten the feat. I still need to decide if it's going to be a pickable or granted feat. But I really need to take a nap, I have to work tonight.
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Uhhgghh, sorry I never got back to you I fell asleep. Trying this now... EDIT Ok wait a minute. Now it's just giving me all options even if I don't have the schematic....
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ok, so... What are P2 and P3 for? And the string parameter field, does that need to change to the actual tag of the item? Or the script is just looking for things with that tag suffix?
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
It could be. I made the feat pickable for jedi classes ( and now I realized the problem with that, cause I dont want the PC to be able to pick it until it's granted) But for the PC it's granted on saber quest completion just like before. (via script not .2da) So what I wished I had was the basic "c_have_item.ncs" but it also checks for the feat. So that I could put the tag of the scheme in the string parameter of the dialog, then maybe the feat row number in the first little box(P1)? Sorry I'm braindead. wishful thinking? Honestly the feat is completely arbitrary, but I had to be able to gate this s*** somehow.
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
OK! Progress! Could someone help me out with writing this check script? I need to basically check to see if you have the particular scheme item tag, as well has checking to see if you have the feat. So I took the script "c_have_any_co_cr", changed the item tags and am trying to add the check for feat to it. I know this is definitely not the way to go about it, but if I had some pro at the helm I would be doing good. Here's what I have. Would this work like this? int StartingConditional() { int int1 = 0; int int2 = 245; object oPC = GetFirstPC(); if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "hero_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))) { int1 = 1; } else { if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "raid_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))) { int1 = 1; } else { if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "enfo_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))) { int1 = 1; } else { if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "cbat_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))) { int1 = 1; } else { if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "dres_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))){ int1 = 1; } else { if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "egrd_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))){ int1 = 1; } else { if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "ckni_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))){ int1 = 1; } else { if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "reva_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))){ int1 = 1; } else { if ((GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "sinq_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))){ int1 = 1; } else { if (GetIsObjectValid(GetItemPossessedBy(oPC, "sage_scheme"))) && (GetHasFeat(int2, OBJECT_SELF))) { int1 = 1; } } } } } } } } } } return int1; } And I do have 3 more schematic tags to add down there at the bottom. Which are... dvet_scheme, shdw_scheme, and stal_scheme. How do we condense this all down and make it all concise and pretty? Many many thanks in advance.
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Right yeah Thing was, my dumba** forgot to go back and manually re-number the existing (install to modules) section after I added a new part, so it all got installed to the wrong modules. smh
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well it was my changes.ini and yeah i recovered. Everything got shifted down because I added a section, so i had to rebuild half of the modules section. That was a b****. I didn’t have a backup changes.ini but i do now
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Welp. I just screwed up my whole mod last night. Don't know if I can fix it. Yeah....maybe next year.
- 206 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks all. But let's move on...
- 206 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
I have to sell the house and move. I could just wait to release next summer or something. Probably will… My brother died from a stroke a few weeks ago and it’s now imperative that i get out from under it (the house) i may be able to get it done before xmas
- 206 replies
-
- 3
-
-
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Aight.
- 206 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
What might cause this? Anyone? the Claivoyant video effect or something else? It's always worked fine until now. All files were inserted into the modules on this install. EDIT: Never mind. I'm a schmuck. I installed the waypoint files but not the .git file for the area. Derp.
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
There's a lot more to it than a name.
- 206 replies
-
- tslrcm 1.8.6
- tsl
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with: