One question, and I don't want to hear automatic bashing.
From what I've seen of it, the team working at BioWare has put their hearts and souls into this game, pushing back the release date because they wanted it to be JUST PERFECT. They've voiced everything, worked hard on developing not just the basic classes but several advanced classes for each basic, balanced each class so it's not all powerful, introduced a variety of sentient races for the PC (something neither KotOR has done), created dozens of NPC's and supporting characters all with backstories, developed a solid storyline that (no matter what path you choose) is approved canon from L/A (and L/A's team of examiners are more anal-retentive to details than some of the people on this site, trust me), and all in all done their absolute best to create the greatest game BioWare has ever made, all while under the shadow of the (failed) Star Wars Galaxies.
So my question to all you griefers is this (looking at you specifically, Hank): What makes you so certain this game is going to be horrible?
And as to the Revan debate, combining what Master Dur'al said about Revan and what Kreia and G0-T0 said about Revan, it looks like what BioWare's going for is that Revan didn't fall, he used those that DID fall to strengthen the Republic.
Both of these are after the Exile says Revan fell and sought to destroy the Republic.
So the way I see it, what BioWare's doing isn't retconning established canon, but rather expanding on it. Malak fell, no doubt about that (and I HATE his canon pre-fall name, F-U KotOR Comics!). But did Revan? I don't think so.