Leaderboard

Hello! Can anyone provide new senior (especially Male) heads to K1? K2 imports would be fine, but I would love to have some completely new ones to add some variety to the game. Cheers!

I am actually planning on doing this as an optional install for the NPC Diversity Pack. In the vanilla game, for normal heads there are 3 white male, 3 asian male, 3 white females, 3 asian female, 2 black male, and 2 black female heads (when you include the Tatooine commoners as the 3rd white and asian heads, that is) and for the senior heads there are 2 white male, 2 asian male, 2 white females, 2 asian females, 2 black males, and 2 black female heads. TLDR, there are 16 generic commoner heads and 12 generic senior commoner heads. In my update, I plan to increase everyone's head count from 2 or 3 all the way up to 5. With my mod, for normal heads there will be 5 white male, 5 asian male, 5 white females, 5 asian female, 5 black male, and 5 black female heads and for the senior heads there will be 5 white male, 5 asian male, 5 white females, 5 asian females, 5 black males, and 5 black female heads. Most of the textures are ready, and with permission granted from Lily (and help porting the models) I've been able to use Lily's NPC Overhaul in my work. Do note that whilst Lily's mod is a HD mod, mine isn't and so the textures I'm using have been reduced to the vanilla 512x512 quality. Below is an example of me testing one of these new textures on Deadeye Duncan's head model, I don't think I'll use this texture on Deadeye's model and I'm certainly not replacing Deadeye's texture but this is to see that the texture looks good in-game. I have also began experimenting with the other head models with the vanilla textures, if I don't use the models and/or textures in the NPC Diversity Pack I'll most likely use it in the Galaxy of Faces mod.

This thread shouldn't have been resurrected from the dead in the first place, definitely not in the method it was, and besides that J has already provided a fix. There's no need for this continued back-and-forth from either side, but with that said to make it utterly clear RonRhea, you are the side which is more in the wrong. You (or, more accurately, your LLM which you quite possibly did not even check the output of before posting) made haughty demands of volunteers and then attempted to dictate the terms at which others could engage with a thread which is not even your own, and which you would not have the right to set the terms of engagement for even if it were yours. Use J's fix or don't, but the topic is closed.